P & F Magazine

Regulatory Sponsored by

Email This Item!
Increase Text Size

Comment: Chinese Import Backlash is a Two-Way Street

Posted: December 12, 2007

Two recent events show that, in the world of US-China trade, the regulatory backlash moves in both directions.

In July, according to a number of media reports, import authorities at the Chinese port of Zhuhai blocked a shipment of barbecue-flavored Pringles due to the presence of potassium bromate, which is legal within specified amounts in the United States, but prohibited in China (and elsewhere). Procter & Gamble, Pringles' brand owner, has disputed the presence of the reportedly carcinogenic material in the chips. However, a China-based spokesperson disputed that, claiming that the chips did include the material, but were intended for sale in the United States or Japan, where potassium bromate is legal. The spokesman went on to blame "unauthorized importers." While the authorities did follow the letter of the law, a number of flavor industry sources have questioned whether the Chinese action was in fact a "tit for tat" action in light of US criticism of China's product safety record.

Meanwhile, the US and Chinese governments, under US pressure, have just announced an agreement on limited food and drug shipment tracking from China. The plan includes several facets: