Sign in

Application of Gas-Liquid Chromatography to the Analysis of Essential Oils

Contact Author NJ Milchard et al.
Fill out my online form.
This is only an excerpt of the full article that appeared in P&F Magazine. The full content is not currently available online.

As a part of a collaborative study, samples of the six oils together with the NC-hydrocarbon mixture were distributed to members of the subcommittee (of the analytical methods committee, RSC, London) with instructions to prepare a standard fingerprint chromatogram of each of the oils using a methyl polysiloxane non-polar capillary column. Details of the NC-hydrocarbon mixture and its application are given in Part XVII.1 Each member was asked to submit the chromatograms of the oils and one of the NC-hydrocarbon mixture run at the beginning and at the end of the series. The latter was to ensure that the characteristics of the column did not change during the exercise.

A total of 36 chromatograms were received, along with the retention times and percentage relative peak areas (area %) and values from the flame ionization detector (FID) for each detected peak. The identities of the components of interest, usually those accounting for more than 1% of the total peak area, were confirmed by two different laboratories using capillary gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with identities determined by comparison with in-house and commercial mass spectral libraries. The relative retention index (RRI) of each peak of interest was calculated relative to the n-alkane series of hydrocarbons run under identical conditions and used to cross-check the peak identities. The g-pack values were calculated for each column used.

It was noted that 1,8-cineole and limonene were not completely resolved on the methyl polysiloxane non-polar column at certain relative concentrations. In these cases, the oils were examined on a polar column and the relative proportions were used to determine their contents on the non-polar column.

Related Content