Ah, the Left Coast strikes again! Senate Bill 484, rebaptized as the California Safe Cosmetics Act, was adopted in late 2005, despite the best efforts of the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, the Fragrance Materials Association of the United States and the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) to inject some reality into this measure. The new legislation will take effect in January 2007 and will require the manufacturers of cosmetic products sold in that state to notify California authorities of the presence of ingredients that have been “… identified as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity.” Who could be opposed to such a motherhood-and-apple pie proposal? Well, for starters there is no de minimus concentration below which reporting would not be required. So the tracest of trace levels of substances such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) would have to be reported.
Expert opinions: The Road Ahead
April 21, 2006
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Regulatory
- 530Update: Food and Flavor Industries Relish Passage of GMO Labeling Bill
- 1276th Edition of Food Chemical Codex Now Open-Source
- 57Will Nixing the EU’s Sugar Quota Bring Sweet Change?
- 56EU Deletes Four Flavor Ingredients on Safety Concerns
- 54Look Who's Talkin' About Natural: FDA Ends Comments
- 42What's the Latest with GMO Labeling?
- 22OEHHA Intends to List β-Myrcene and Pulegone as Cancer Causing
- 20FEMA Updates GRAS List
- 17FDA Hosts Industry Webinar on Nutrition Facts Label
- 17Ensuring Regulatory Compliance for Flavor Companies
- Regulatory Watch: Trans Fat, GRAS, Fragrance Guidelines and More
- Regulatory View: The Taste Test
4/6/2016, Tim Adams
- European Flavor Regulation (EC) No. 2232/96
4/6/2016, Louise-Anne Vervaet
- TSCA and TSCA Compliance
4/6/2016, Daniel F. Rovelli and Robert H. Bedoukian
- The Significance of GRAS and Nature-Identical for Worldwide Harmonization of Flavor Regulation
4/6/2016, Jan Stofberg