In a position released May 30, the EFSA announced that it could not rule out a clastogenic or aneugenic potential for two substances, 3-(2-furyl) acrylaldehyde and 4-(2-furyl)but-3-en-2-one. The two chemicals were chosen to represent a subgroup of six furyl derivatives with the α,β-unsaturation in the side chain, and each contained a structure that is an alert for genotoxicity. The panel determined that in order to fully understand the genotoxic risk, an in vivo Comet assay should be performed for both substances, with an additional micronucleus assay for 3-(2-furyl) acrylaldehyde.
EFSA Evaluates Genotoxicity Potential of Six Flavors
June 3, 2012
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Regulatory
- 281Campbell Starts to Label 'GMO'
- 167FDA Dissuades Using ‘GMO’ Acronym on Labels
- 146Flavorchem Launches Line of Non-GMO Ingredients
- 1396th Edition of Food Chemical Codex Now Open-Source
- 66Update: Flavor Under Fire in E-Cigarettes
- 45OEHHA Intends to List β-Myrcene and Pulegone as Cancer Causing
- 42European Commission Orders to Remove Perilla Aldehyde Flavoring
- 34EFSA: Citrus Flavor Perilla Aldehyde is Unsafe, Genotoxic
- 27FEMA GRAS 26 Now Available
- 27FEMA GRAS 27 List Adds New Materials, Nixes Quinoline and More
- How to: Organic Certification
5/13/2009, Jessica Walden and Ellen Holton, Quality Assurance International Inc.
- Ensuring Regulatory Compliance for Flavor Companies
1/9/2009, Patty Benson, SAFC
- A Structured Approach toward Standardized Specifications for the Flavor Industry
3/18/2009, G. Lösing, B. Ebeling, J. Foerstner, R. Althage, C.O. Schmidt and G.E. Krammer, Symrise
- Naturally Does It
11/16/2009, Steve Pringle (with John Gilroy), Frutarom USA
- NEXT: Commoditization and Food/Flavor Safety
1/13/2010, Jeb Gleason-Allured, Editor