As a part of the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) draft guidance document for the safety assessment of botanicals, due later this month, a list of botanicals that should be banned from use in food products will be produced. The European Botanical Forum (EBF) hopes this move will assist with the harmonization of food laws across Europe, establishing clearly what can and can’t be used while creating transparency in the process. The EBF already has its own list that includes 60 plants that should be considered toxic and not be allowed for food supplements. The EFSA banned list is expected later this month, with the final vote likely to be reached by 2010.
Banned Botanicals List Emerging
December 6, 2007
Fill out my online form.
Most Popular in Regulatory
- 1486th Edition of Food Chemical Codex Now Open-Source
- 112GMO Labeling Debate Heats Up in Washington
- 62OEHHA Intends to List β-Myrcene and Pulegone as Cancer Causing
- 28What's the Latest with GMO Labeling?
- 24Ensuring Regulatory Compliance for Flavor Companies
- 22EFSA: Citrus Flavor Perilla Aldehyde is Unsafe, Genotoxic
- 21FEMA Updates GRAS List
- 15FEMA GRAS 27 List Adds New Materials, Nixes Quinoline and More
- 15FDA Proposes Rule to Extend its Authority over E-cigarettes
- 14FEMA GRAS 26 Now Available
- Regulatory Watch: Trans Fat, GRAS, Fragrance Guidelines and More
- Regulatory View: The Taste Test
4/6/2016, Tim Adams
- European Flavor Regulation (EC) No. 2232/96
4/6/2016, Louise-Anne Vervaet
- TSCA and TSCA Compliance
4/6/2016, Daniel F. Rovelli and Robert H. Bedoukian
- The Significance of GRAS and Nature-Identical for Worldwide Harmonization of Flavor Regulation
4/6/2016, Jan Stofberg